Am I missing something here? When the Walgreens commercial begins, a lady is putting a prosthetic on her left leg, and in the next scene, the "prosthetic" is on her right leg. Is the second scene a look-a-like or a twin who is pretending to wear a prosthetic? I'm not sure what the idea was behind that. They could have simply shown the lady putting the prosthetic on her left leg if she isn't able to steady herself on it. Watch the YouTube video of the commercial below. Walgreens logo courtesy of WiscNews
While watching the 1999 version of The Mummy starring Brendan Fraser and Evelyn Weisz, I noticed so many inconsistencies. Image courtesy of IMDB First off, at the beginning of the movie, Imhotep (Arnold Vosloo) is bound in mummy wrap. The scarabs that were put into his sarcophagus with him quickly started eating away at his flesh. Later in the movie, we see others have their flesh eaten off in a matter of seconds, yet Evelyn (Weisz) tells Rick (Fraser) and her brother, Jonathan (John Hannah) that the flesh of Imhotep would have been eaten slowly. Which is highly contradictory to what we are being shown. Upon opening Imhotep's sarcophagus, there are also scratch marks on the lid, trying to make us believe he tried to claw his way out. Again, at the beginning of the movie, Imhotep was tightly mummy wrapped, deeming it impossible for him to have attempted clawing his way out of the sarcophagus. Besides, he was also eaten alive by those scarabs - whether quickly or slowly. Later on